Welcome to Origami Project Sign in | Join
| Help
in Search
 

Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

Last post 04-06-2008, 6:21 PM by Dan Dar3. 23 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (24 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  05-09-2007, 3:55 AM 20000 in reply to 19994

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    I suspect that the DisablePagingExecutive may be one factor in your results being better.

    I think a machine that has stabilised with all the prefetch activity finished should perform pretty much the same regardless of the prefetch tunings. What the tunings should do is avoid the tendancy to get into an overutilised state when you close a large application. That is the thing that I thought was marginalising the experience.

    -Andy
  •  05-11-2007, 12:15 PM 20114 in reply to 19843

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    I just tried this and did find one thing right off the bat. My computer goes into Sleep a lot faster than it did before. More like when I first got it.
  •  05-11-2007, 12:50 PM 20115 in reply to 20114

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    Jep disabling the SuperFetch and the Paging does seem to speed things up a great bit.

    ReadyBoost however is still terrible for performance, so I've disabled it all together ...

  •  05-11-2007, 12:52 PM 20116 in reply to 20114

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    Thanks for the info folks.. could I ask anyone that tries this and wants to comment what their UMPC is, if they were using a ReadyBoost device and what memory is fitted to the machine?

    It may be with a small memory device that the prefetch isn't as active and it is more suitable. I would kinda like to get some stats.

    -Andy
  •  05-12-2007, 10:56 AM 20161 in reply to 20116

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    I created a  VBS Script to apply this hack.
  •  05-12-2007, 12:56 PM 20162 in reply to 20161

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    Thankyou for the hack. makes life that bit-easier! I've applied this patch and its true, although not a vast speed increase, everything does seem that bit snappier on my T700! Good Work!
  •  05-13-2007, 2:34 PM 20184 in reply to 20162

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    The i7210 owners have been suffering because with Vista their units do not go off,  standby or Hibernation. Well, I got a report saying thatthese issues disappeared after the application of this hack.
  •  05-14-2007, 5:36 AM 20199 in reply to 20184

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    Ive applied this to the Medion and while i cant report any speed improvements, it appears to have stopped the disk thrashing. Thanks for the tip! With indexing, defender and phishing filter off its now starting to act like a normal umpc! im even getting used to the thumbpad. keyboard is still horrible though!

  •  04-06-2008, 6:21 PM 30562 in reply to 19843

    Re: Vista SuperFetch is it really suitable for UMPCs?

    Hi Andy,

    Thanks for the tip. I haven't applied the registry change, I've just set the SuperFetch and ReadyBoost services to manual. Vista on my R2H 1.2 GB feels more responsive and the CPU doesn't seem to go anymore at 100% for longer periods. This may be obvious since SuperFetch was responsable with pre-loading applications in memory, but now there's consitently free memory in Task Manager - this may be good news for people thinking that Vista is a memory hog, well there was a reason behind that.

    I believe Vista should perform some tests at setup time and look at things like CPU, memory and disk throughoput to decide whether SuperFetch should be enabled or not.

    - Dan

Page 2 of 2 (24 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML

© Copyright 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.